home of matt pearson, maker of abstract things.


twitter
 rss feed







all
agalmics (9)
art (19)
bad science (8)
bullets (16)
comics (13)
computers ate my brain (7)
criminal justice (10)
culture (53)
digital rights (1)
evolution (10)
fatherhood (14)
film (9)
flash (6)
fotb (3)
games (5)
generative art (28)
generative art book (7)
introspection (19)
literature (16)
music (10)
old media (3)
open source (12)
philosophy (51)
retro (9)
society (23)
tech (41)
universal automatism (7)
video (17)
web (17)
writing (4)
wtf (5)
zen (10)


Log in
August 2010 (1)
July 2010 (2)
June 2010 (2)
May 2010 (2)
April 2010 (2)
March 2010 (2)
February 2010 (4)
January 2010 (3)
December 2009 (2)
November 2009 (3)
September 2009 (2)
July 2009 (3)
June 2009 (1)
May 2009 (3)
April 2009 (5)
March 2009 (4)
February 2009 (2)
December 2008 (1)
November 2008 (4)
October 2008 (1)
September 2008 (1)
August 2008 (3)
July 2008 (4)
June 2008 (3)
April 2008 (3)
March 2008 (3)
February 2008 (2)
January 2008 (5)
December 2007 (1)
November 2007 (4)
October 2007 (6)
September 2007 (6)
August 2007 (6)
July 2007 (5)
June 2007 (2)
May 2007 (2)
April 2007 (6)
March 2007 (3)
February 2007 (3)
January 2007 (4)
December 2006 (3)
November 2006 (2)
September 2006 (1)
August 2006 (1)

Leviathan, Narcissism and Blogging

typewriter

I recently re-read Paul Auster’s Leviathan. My favourite character is Maria; artist, fantasist, detective, a classic Auster character. We are introduced to her like this:

“Her subject was the eye, the drama of watching and being watched, and her pieces exhibited the same qualities one found in Maria herself: meticulous attention to detail, a reliance on arbitrary structures, patience bordering on the unendurable. In one work, she hired a private detective to follow her around the city. For several days, this man took pictures of her as she went about her rounds, recording her movements in a small notebook, omitting nothing from the account, not even the most banal and transitory events: crossing the streets, buying a newspaper, stopping for a cup of coffee. It was a completely artificial exercise, and yet Maria found it thrilling that anyone should take such an active interest in her. Microscopic actions became fraught with new meaning, the driest routines were charged with uncommon emotion. After several hours, she grew so attached to the detective that she almost forgot she was paying him. When he handed in his report at the end of the week and she studied the photographs of herself and read the exhaustive chronologies of her movements, she felt as if she had become a stranger, as if she had been turned into an imaginary being”

My first thought on re-reading this passage was: if Maria were around today, she’d have been a blogger. I have been blogging for over a year now, and I’ve never really stopped to ask myself why I do it. With Maria’s help, I’m beginning to form an understanding.

I have always written, I find it very cathartic, but I have also been an obsessively private person, and have taken ridiculous measures to protect my writings from the eyes of unpermitted observers. Even those close to me; especially those close to me. Then, with minimal encouragement from my friend Mr G, last year I overcame this introversion and started writing a blog. Out there, in the public sphere. Where everyone could see it. Then people starting reading it, and giving me nice comments (and some nasty ones too), and it started to feel good. Now it seems perfectly natural for me to share the contents of my brain with an anonymous audience. I now wonder if I could stop if I tried to.

But I secretly suspect there may be a huge narcissism to blogging. Even though I am writing with the intention of creating something others would enjoy reading, I suspect the main person I am writing for is myself. This means that somehow, last year, I went from extreme introversion to extreme narcissism in the space of a few months. This seems rather out of character for me.

Which is where Maria has helped in my introspection. I think what I am doing with a blog is objectifying my thoughts, experimenting with a new way of looking at myself, asking what I might learn if I were to see myself as “a stranger”, or an “imaginary being”. You see, over the last two years I have been living through a very strange situation, one that has completely changed my outlook on life. It has forced me to examine myself in greater detail than I ever have before, re-evaluate my moral standpoint and made me question myself and my place in society. I’m not talking about fatherhood this time; it’s something I haven’t blogged about yet, as it’s all a bit close to home at the moment. But I’m sure I will soon, as I seem to have no issue with laying myself out on the slab these days.

They say the things that don’t kill you make you stronger. In this case, forcing myself to question a lot of my assumptions, philosophy and world-view, the things that can’t kill me seem to have made me a blogger.



8 Responses to “Leviathan, Narcissism and Blogging”

  1. I think what I am doing with a blog is objectifying my thoughts

    That’s the core mission of autobiography I reckon. I’d say it’s “universalising the mundane” or something but that’s all semantics.

    Interesting train of thought – be interested to see how you’d fit the audience into this. Your catharsis is public these days and that is relevant in some way.

  2. Cheers Pete. I can only really say why I write it. Why anyone reads it is probably a question for someone else.

Leave a Reply

  1. [...] I went through a big Auster phase around 1998-2002 though I appear to be missing a few of the cannon. Prompted by Zenbullets writing about Leviathan which I forgot I’d even read until I saw the summary on Amazon. Reading Auster was like reprogramming bits of my brain in subtle but important ways. I think it would be useful to repeat that process. [...]

  2. Kramer auto Pingback[...] Billy, you’re ruining all the magic!Fascinating stuff though. I tend to fall into self imposed routines with my blogging too, it’s the only way to keep a regular flow. I’ve never thought them interesting enough to document though.But the next question we need you to answer is not “how”, but “why”. I had a crack at that recently and was actually a little freaked out by my conclusions. [...]

  3. [...] this post. But I have realised that this part of the tale is already well told. Last year I wrote a post about Paul Auster, where I touched upon the motivations behind the writing of this blog (every blogger is allowed at [...]

  4. [...] like me, you, and Scobleizer are the most narcissistic smoothies we can imagine, very much like people that hire detectives to watch themselves, or rappers (Rap is as dead—as isblogging, by the [...]

  5. [...] ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????Scobleizer??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? [...]

  6. [...] ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????Scobleizer??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? [...]